ASIA vs VTI
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASIA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASIA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $52M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.17% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.50% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.89% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
ASIA vs VTI Performance
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASIA returned +36.50% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, ASIA is up 18.17% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, ASIA compounded at +18.89% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, ASIA has the edge at +18.89% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASIA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.9% for ASIA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASIA charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASIA currently yields 0.91% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ASIA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2844 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASIA or VTI?
ASIA has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASIA or VTI?
Over the past year ASIA returned +36.50% vs +22.35% for VTI, so ASIA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ASIA annualized +18.89% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASIA or VTI?
ASIA has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ASIA -23.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ASIA and VTI?
ASIA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASIA and VTI?
ASIA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2844 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASIA or VTI?
ASIA yields 0.91% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.