ASIA vs VOO
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ASIA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASIA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $52M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.69% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.06% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.74% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ASIA vs VOO Performance
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASIA returned +36.06% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, ASIA is up 17.69% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, ASIA compounded at +18.74% per year against +21.79% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, ASIA has the edge at +18.74% annualized vs +13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASIA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.9% for ASIA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASIA charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASIA currently yields 0.91% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ASIA and VOO share 0 holdings out of 562 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASIA or VOO?
ASIA has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASIA or VOO?
Over the past year ASIA returned +36.06% vs +20.92% for VOO, so ASIA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ASIA annualized +18.74% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASIA or VOO?
ASIA has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ASIA -23.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ASIA and VOO?
ASIA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASIA and VOO?
ASIA and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 562 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASIA or VOO?
ASIA yields 0.91% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.