AVUV vs IJR
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Which is better, AVUV or IJR?
Small Cap Value against Small Cap Blend.
IJR has a lower expense ratio. AVUV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IJR is less concentrated, with 6.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 8.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVUV | IJR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $31.0B | $108.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 1.14% |
| Holdings | 789 | 662 |
| YTD Return | +21.02%Best | +16.92% |
| 1Y Return | +25.16%Best | +20.69% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.98%Best | +14.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.91%Best | +7.07% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.4% | 22.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.6% | -42.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,351Best | $14,071 |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.3% | 6.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2019 | May 22, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2019 to Sep 14, 2026 (7 years).
AVUV vs IJR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7 years both funds cover.
AVUV vs IJR Performance
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AVUV returned +25.16% while IJR returned +20.69%. Year to date, AVUV is up 21.02% versus a gain of 16.92% for IJR.
Over three years, AVUV compounded at +17.98% per year against +14.93% for IJR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.91% and +7.07% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AVUV has the edge at +15.33% annualized vs +10.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVUV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.4% compared with 22.1% for IJR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.6% for AVUV and -42.6% for IJR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVUV charges 0.25% per year while IJR charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $6 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVUV currently yields 1.25% against 1.14% for IJR.
Holdings Overlap
48.1% of AVUV's money is in holdings IJR also owns. 32.9% of IJR's money is in holdings AVUV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
224 positions in common, counted across the 727 positions we hold weights for in AVUV and 592 in IJR, against full books of 789 and 662.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 361 positions for IJR that do not appear in our book for AVUV (64.9% of the fund), and 414 for AVUV that do not appear in IJR (46.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVUV | Weight in IJR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VSATViasat Inc | 1.09% | 0.51% | 0.58% |
| MATXMatson Inc | 1.04% | 0.37% | 0.67% |
| SMSm Energy Co | 0.79% | 0.49% | 0.30% |
| KMXCarmax Inc. | 0.50% | 0.49% | 0.01% |
| SNEXStonex Group Inc | 0.58% | 0.41% | 0.17% |
| PAYCPaycom Software Inc . | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.17% |
| RUSHARush Enterprises Inc | 0.70% | 0.25% | 0.45% |
| CAKECheesecake Factory Inc/the | 0.65% | 0.28% | 0.37% |
| SKYWSkywest Inc | 0.72% | 0.21% | 0.51% |
| MGYMagnolia Oil & Gas Corp | 0.56% | 0.36% | 0.20% |
48.1% of AVUV is already inside IJR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVUV or IJR?
AVUV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IJR charges 0.06%. IJR is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVUV or IJR?
Over the past year AVUV returned +25.16% vs +20.69% for IJR, so AVUV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AVUV annualized +15.33% vs +10.17% for IJR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVUV or IJR?
AVUV has been the more volatile fund at 25.4% annualized versus 22.1% for IJR. Worst drawdown: AVUV -49.6% vs IJR -42.6%.
Should I hold both AVUV and IJR?
AVUV and IJR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AVUV and IJR?
48.1% of AVUV's money is in holdings IJR also owns. 32.9% of IJR's is in holdings AVUV also owns. They hold 224 positions in common, counted across the 727 positions we hold weights for in AVUV and 592 in IJR.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVUV or IJR?
AVUV yields 1.25% while IJR yields 1.14%, so AVUV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IJR better than AVUV?
IJR has a lower expense ratio. AVUV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IJR is less concentrated, with 6.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 8.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.