AVUV vs DFSV

AVUV vs DFSV

Which is better, AVUV or DFSV?

Nearly the same fund. AVUV costs less.

AVUV has a lower expense ratio. AVUV led over 3Y and the full window, DFSV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.

Lower Fees: AVUVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVUVDFSV
Expense Ratio0.25%Best0.30%
AUM$31.8B$27.1B
Dividend Yield1.22%1.38%
Holdings1,5911,065
YTD Return+17.21%Best+16.78%
1Y Return+25.15%+25.36%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+17.98%Best+17.28%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.24%-
Volatility (annualized)22.0%21.2%Best
Max Drawdown-28.8%-28.0%Best
$10,000 over 4.7 years$16,934Best$16,470
Fund FamilyAvantis InvestorsDimensional
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap ValueSmall Cap Value
InceptionSep 24, 2019Feb 23, 2022

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Nov 6, 2026 (4.7 years).

AVUV vs DFSV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.

AVUV vs DFSV Performance

Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) is an ETF from Dimensional. Over the past year AVUV returned +25.15% while DFSV returned +25.36%. Year to date, AVUV is up 17.21% versus a gain of 16.78% for DFSV.

Over three years, AVUV compounded at +17.98% per year against +17.28% for DFSV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AVUV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 21.2% for DFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.8% for AVUV and -28.0% for DFSV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVUV charges 0.25% per year while DFSV charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $30 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVUV currently yields 1.22% against 1.38% for DFSV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AVUV and DFSV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AVUVDFSV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVUV or DFSV?

AVUV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while DFSV charges 0.30%. AVUV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, AVUV or DFSV?

Over the past year AVUV returned +25.15% vs +25.36% for DFSV, so DFSV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, AVUV or DFSV?

AVUV has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 21.2% for DFSV. Worst drawdown: AVUV -28.8% vs DFSV -28.0%.

Should I hold both AVUV and DFSV?

AVUV and DFSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AVUV or DFSV?

AVUV yields 1.22% while DFSV yields 1.38%, so DFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is DFSV better than AVUV?

AVUV has a lower expense ratio. AVUV led over 3Y and the full window, DFSV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.