BABW vs VYM
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BABW or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BABW | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 59.07% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 5 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -48.73% | +8.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -54.97% | +12.18%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BABW vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BABW vs VYM Performance
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BABW returned -54.97% while VYM returned +12.18%. Year to date, BABW is down 48.73% versus a gain of 8.51% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BABW charges 1.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $4 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BABW currently yields 59.07% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in BABW and 557 in VYM, totalling 23.9% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in BABW and 557 in VYM, against full books of 5 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BABW and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BABW or VYM?
BABW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BABW or VYM?
Over the past year BABW returned -54.97% vs +12.18% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BABW or VYM?
BABW yields 59.07% while VYM yields 2.22%, so BABW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BABW?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.