BABW vs IVV
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BABW or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BABW | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 59.07% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -48.91% | +12.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | -55.13% | +15.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 54.8% | 13.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BABW vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BABW vs IVV Performance
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BABW returned -55.13% while IVV returned +15.57%. Year to date, BABW is down 48.91% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BABW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 54.8% compared with 13.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BABW charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BABW currently yields 59.07% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in BABW and 505 in IVV, totalling 21.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in BABW and 505 in IVV, against full books of 10 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BABW and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BABW or IVV?
BABW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BABW or IVV?
Over the past year BABW returned -55.13% vs +15.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BABW or IVV?
BABW has been the more volatile fund at 54.8% annualized versus 13.3% for IVV.
Should I hold both BABW and IVV?
BABW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BABW or IVV?
BABW yields 59.07% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BABW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BABW?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.