BABW vs IVV
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BABW or IVV?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BABW | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 47.64% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -44.43% | +12.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.75% |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BABW vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BABW vs IVV Performance
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BABW is down 44.43% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BABW charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BABW currently yields 47.64% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in BABW and 504 in IVV, totalling 33.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in BABW and 504 in IVV, against full books of 5 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BABW and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BABW or IVV?
BABW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BABW or IVV?
BABW yields 47.64% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BABW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BABW?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.