BABW vs VTI
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BABW or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BABW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 59.07% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -46.21% | +12.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | -52.76% | +18.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.62% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.68% |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BABW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BABW vs VTI Performance
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BABW returned -52.76% while VTI returned +18.37%. Year to date, BABW is down 46.21% versus a gain of 12.34% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BABW charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BABW currently yields 59.07% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in BABW and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 23.9% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, BABW as of Sep 1, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in BABW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 5 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BABW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BABW or VTI?
BABW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BABW or VTI?
Over the past year BABW returned -52.76% vs +18.37% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BABW or VTI?
BABW yields 59.07% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BABW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BABW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.