BASV vs SASS
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or SASS?
BASV costs less.
BASV has a lower expense ratio. BASV is less concentrated, with 34.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | SASS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $413M | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 42 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +7.52%Best | -7.30% |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | MD Sass |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Mar 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BASV vs SASS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BASV vs SASS Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, BASV is up 7.52% versus a loss of 7.30% for SASS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $75 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 0.00% for SASS.
Holdings Overlap
6.2% of BASV's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 10.1% of SASS's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
SASS and BASV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 22 in SASS, against full books of 42 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 41 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
BASV holds 34 positions SASS does not, 76.9% of the fund.
Largest: THC 3.91%, CAH 3.86%, MSFT 3.68%, DELL 3.48%, BDX 3.47%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BASV and SASS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or SASS?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while SASS charges 0.75%. BASV is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and SASS?
10.1% of SASS's money is in holdings BASV also owns. 10.1% of SASS's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 22 in SASS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or SASS?
BASV yields 0.38% while SASS yields 0.00%, so BASV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SASS better than BASV?
BASV has a lower expense ratio. BASV is less concentrated, with 34.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.