BASV vs VTI
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $429M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.38% | +13.86% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.69% | +20.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.90% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
BASV vs VTI Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is a ETF from Brown Advisory and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BASV returned +18.69% while VTI returned +20.74%. Year to date, BASV is up 13.38% versus a gain of 13.86% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.6% for BASV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BASV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $3 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.37% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BASV and VTI share 34 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or VTI?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $68 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BASV or VTI?
Over the past year BASV returned +18.69% vs +20.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASV annualized +21.70% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BASV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.6% for BASV. Worst drawdown: BASV -9.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BASV and VTI?
BASV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and VTI?
BASV and VTI share 34 common holdings with a 10.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or VTI?
BASV yields 0.37% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.