BBEM vs FQAL
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 1,132 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | FQAL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $863M | $1.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.92% | 1.15% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 130 | |
| YTD Return | +18.05% | +12.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.96% | +19.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.70% | +20.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -34.1% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Fidelity Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Sep 12, 2016 |
BBEM vs FQAL Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year BBEM returned +34.96% while FQAL returned +19.37%. Year to date, BBEM is up 18.05% versus a gain of 12.56% for FQAL.
Over three years, BBEM compounded at +21.70% per year against +20.54% for FQAL. Across the full 3-year window we track, BBEM has the edge at +19.99% annualized vs +13.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 15.0% for FQAL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -34.1% for FQAL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while FQAL charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $15 annually. On income, BBEM currently yields 4.92% against 1.15% for FQAL.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or FQAL?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FQAL charges 0.15%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or FQAL?
Over the past year BBEM returned +34.96% vs +19.37% for FQAL, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBEM annualized +19.99% vs +13.76% for FQAL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or FQAL?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 15.0% for FQAL. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs FQAL -34.1%.
Should I hold both BBEM and FQAL?
BBEM and FQAL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and FQAL?
BBEM and FQAL share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1012 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or FQAL?
BBEM yields 4.92% while FQAL yields 1.15%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.