BBIB vs SPY
BBIB vs SPY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
BBIB has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBIB | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $54M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.74% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | -1.56% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.37% | +23.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.26% | +21.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2023 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BBIB vs SPY Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BBIB returned +0.37% while SPY returned +23.66%. Year to date, BBIB is down 1.56% versus a gain of 13.79% for SPY.
Over three years, BBIB compounded at +3.26% per year against +21.40% for SPY. Across the full 3-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.85% annualized vs +2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 4.5% for BBIB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.4% for BBIB and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBIB charges 0.04% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $9 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBIB currently yields 3.74% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
BBIB and SPY share 0 holdings out of 571 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBIB or SPY?
BBIB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while SPY charges 0.09%. BBIB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBIB or SPY?
Over the past year BBIB returned +0.37% vs +23.66% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBIB annualized +2.51% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBIB or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 4.5% for BBIB. Worst drawdown: BBIB -6.4% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BBIB and SPY?
BBIB and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBIB and SPY?
BBIB and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 571 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBIB or SPY?
BBIB yields 3.74% while SPY yields 1.01%, so BBIB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.