BBIB vs VXUS
BBIB vs VXUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
BBIB has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBIB | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $54M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.74% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -1.56% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.37% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.26% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BBIB vs VXUS Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBIB returned +0.37% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BBIB is down 1.56% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BBIB compounded at +3.26% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.5% for BBIB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.4% for BBIB and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBIB charges 0.04% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $5 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBIB currently yields 3.74% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BBIB and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7929 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBIB or VXUS?
BBIB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VXUS charges 0.05%. BBIB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBIB or VXUS?
Over the past year BBIB returned +0.37% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBIB annualized +2.51% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBIB or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.5% for BBIB. Worst drawdown: BBIB -6.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BBIB and VXUS?
BBIB and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBIB and VXUS?
BBIB and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7929 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBIB or VXUS?
BBIB yields 3.74% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BBIB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.