BBIN vs VYM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBIN offers more diversification with 645 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBIN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $6.8B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.62% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 645 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +11.45% | +15.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.73% | +22.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.39% | +18.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.95% | +12.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BBIN vs VYM Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBIN returned +21.73% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, BBIN is up 11.45% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Over three years, BBIN compounded at +18.39% per year against +18.81% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.95% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BBIN has the edge at +10.19% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for BBIN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBIN charges 0.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $4 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBIN currently yields 3.62% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BBIN and VYM share 6 holdings out of 1206 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBIN or VYM?
BBIN has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBIN or VYM?
Over the past year BBIN returned +21.73% vs +22.23% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BBIN annualized +10.19% vs +7.02% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBIN or VYM?
BBIN has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BBIN -33.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BBIN and VYM?
BBIN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBIN and VYM?
BBIN and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1206 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBIN or VYM?
BBIN yields 3.62% while VYM yields 2.24%, so BBIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.