BBIN vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBIN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.5B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.87% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 670 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.74% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.00% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.21% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
BBIN vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBIN returned +20.94% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, BBIN is up 11.74% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, BBIN compounded at +18.00% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.21% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BBIN has the edge at +10.32% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for BBIN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBIN charges 0.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBIN currently yields 2.87% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BBIN and VTI share 9 holdings out of 3393 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBIN or VTI?
BBIN has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBIN or VTI?
Over the past year BBIN returned +20.94% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BBIN annualized +10.32% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBIN or VTI?
BBIN has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBIN -33.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBIN and VTI?
BBIN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBIN and VTI?
BBIN and VTI share 9 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3393 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBIN or VTI?
BBIN yields 2.87% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BBIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.