BBIN vs QQQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BBIN or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
BBIN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BBIN is less concentrated, with 13.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBIN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $6.8B | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.62% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 645 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +11.45% | +17.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.73% | +26.50%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.39% | +24.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.95% | +14.15%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6%Best | 20.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,351 | $19,381Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.9%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2019 to Sep 3, 2026 (6.7 years).
BBIN vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.7 years both funds cover.
BBIN vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BBIN returned +21.73% while QQQ returned +26.50%. Year to date, BBIN is up 11.45% versus a gain of 17.33% for QQQ.
Over three years, BBIN compounded at +18.39% per year against +24.58% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.95% and +14.15% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +21.18% annualized vs +10.19%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 16.6% for BBIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for BBIN and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBIN charges 0.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $18 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBIN currently yields 3.62% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of BBIN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings BBIN also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 609 positions we hold weights for in BBIN and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 645 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BBIN (97.5% of the fund), and 17 for BBIN that do not appear in QQQ (4.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBIN | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FER:ASFerrovial Se | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBIN and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBIN or QQQ?
BBIN has an expense ratio of 0.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BBIN is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBIN or QQQ?
Over the past year BBIN returned +21.73% vs +26.50% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BBIN annualized +10.19% vs +21.18% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBIN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 16.6% for BBIN. Worst drawdown: BBIN -33.4% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both BBIN and QQQ?
BBIN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBIN or QQQ?
BBIN yields 3.62% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BBIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BBIN?
BBIN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BBIN is less concentrated, with 13.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.