BBIN vs QQQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
BBIN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBIN offers more diversification with 619 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBIN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $6.5B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.87% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 670 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.74% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.00% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.21% | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BBIN vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BBIN returned +20.94% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, BBIN is up 11.74% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, BBIN compounded at +18.00% per year against +26.25% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.21% and +15.39% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.8% for BBIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for BBIN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBIN charges 0.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $18 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBIN currently yields 2.87% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BBIN and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 719 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBIN or QQQ?
BBIN has an expense ratio of 0.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BBIN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBIN or QQQ?
Over the past year BBIN returned +20.94% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BBIN annualized +10.32% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBIN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.8% for BBIN. Worst drawdown: BBIN -33.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BBIN and QQQ?
BBIN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBIN and QQQ?
BBIN and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 719 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBIN or QQQ?
BBIN yields 2.87% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BBIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.