BBIN vs VOO
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBIN offers more diversification with 619 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBIN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.5B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.87% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 670 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.54% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.32% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.95% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.31% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BBIN vs VOO Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBIN returned +21.32% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, BBIN is up 11.54% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, BBIN compounded at +17.95% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.31% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for BBIN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBIN charges 0.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBIN currently yields 2.87% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BBIN and VOO share 4 holdings out of 1120 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBIN or VOO?
BBIN has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBIN or VOO?
Over the past year BBIN returned +21.32% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BBIN annualized +10.30% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBIN or VOO?
BBIN has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BBIN -33.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BBIN and VOO?
BBIN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBIN and VOO?
BBIN and VOO share 4 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1120 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBIN or VOO?
BBIN yields 2.87% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BBIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.