BBJP vs QQQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBJP offers more diversification with 184 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBJP | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $19.6B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.75% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 184 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +15.28% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.02% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.87% | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BBJP vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BBJP returned +22.02% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, BBJP is up 15.28% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, BBJP compounded at +20.02% per year against +26.08% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.87% and +15.18% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.7% for BBJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for BBJP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBJP charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBJP currently yields 4.75% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BBJP and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 275 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBJP or QQQ?
BBJP has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBJP or QQQ?
Over the past year BBJP returned +22.02% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBJP annualized +8.06% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBJP or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.7% for BBJP. Worst drawdown: BBJP -32.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BBJP and QQQ?
BBJP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBJP and QQQ?
BBJP and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 275 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBJP or QQQ?
BBJP yields 4.75% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BBJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.