BBJP vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBJP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19.6B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.75% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 184 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.32% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.30% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.83% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.14% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
BBJP vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBJP returned +28.30% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, BBJP is up 19.32% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, BBJP compounded at +20.83% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.14% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, BBJP has the edge at +8.53% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.8% for BBJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for BBJP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBJP charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBJP currently yields 4.75% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BBJP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2960 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBJP or VTI?
BBJP has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBJP or VTI?
Over the past year BBJP returned +28.30% vs +22.43% for VTI, so BBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBJP annualized +8.53% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBJP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.8% for BBJP. Worst drawdown: BBJP -32.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBJP and VTI?
BBJP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBJP and VTI?
BBJP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2960 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBJP or VTI?
BBJP yields 4.75% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BBJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.