BBJP vs VYM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BBJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBJP | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $19.6B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.75% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 184 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +19.32% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.30% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.83% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.14% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BBJP vs VYM Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBJP returned +28.30% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, BBJP is up 19.32% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, BBJP compounded at +20.83% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.14% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, BBJP has the edge at +8.53% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for BBJP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBJP charges 0.19% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $4 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBJP currently yields 4.75% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BBJP and VYM share 0 holdings out of 776 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBJP or VYM?
BBJP has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBJP or VYM?
Over the past year BBJP returned +28.30% vs +24.22% for VYM, so BBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBJP annualized +8.53% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBJP or VYM?
BBJP has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BBJP -32.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BBJP and VYM?
BBJP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBJP and VYM?
BBJP and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 776 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBJP or VYM?
BBJP yields 4.75% while VYM yields 2.24%, so BBJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.