BBP vs VTI
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $106M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 70 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +27.15% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.96% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.01% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.36% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
BBP vs VTI Performance
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBP returned +51.96% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, BBP is up 27.15% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, BBP compounded at +24.01% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.36% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, BBP has the edge at +12.52% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for BBP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBP charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBP currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BBP and VTI share 48 holdings out of 2807 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBP or VTI?
BBP has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBP or VTI?
Over the past year BBP returned +51.96% vs +22.43% for VTI, so BBP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), BBP annualized +12.52% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBP or VTI?
BBP has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBP -44.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBP and VTI?
BBP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBP and VTI?
BBP and VTI share 48 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2807 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBP or VTI?
BBP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.