BCGD vs QQQ
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BCGD or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCGD | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | - | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 42 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +4.71% | +17.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.18% |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.4% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCGD vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCGD vs QQQ Performance
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BCGD is up 4.71% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCGD charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGD currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
31.4% of BCGD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 24.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings BCGD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 42 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 86 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BCGD (73.4% of the fund), and 16 for BCGD that do not appear in QQQ (36.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCGD | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.97% | 8.44% | 1.47% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.64% | 4.67% | 1.97% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C | 5.23% | 3.13% | 2.10% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.79% | 2.78% | 0.01% |
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares | 4.65% | 0.68% | 3.97% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.07% | 3.16% | 2.09% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 1.84% | 0.29% | 1.55% |
| MELIMercadolibre Inc | 1.39% | 0.43% | 0.96% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 0.84% | 0.56% | 0.28% |
31.4% of BCGD is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCGD or QQQ?
BCGD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCGD and QQQ?
31.4% of BCGD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 24.1% of QQQ's is in holdings BCGD also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCGD or QQQ?
BCGD yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BCGD?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.