BCHI vs VYM
GMO Beyond China ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BCHI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCHI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $18M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.45% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +23.32% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.30% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GMO | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BCHI vs VYM Performance
GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) is a ETF from GMO and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCHI returned +40.30% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, BCHI is up 23.32% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCHI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for BCHI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCHI charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCHI currently yields 3.45% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BCHI and VYM share 0 holdings out of 656 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCHI or VYM?
BCHI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCHI or VYM?
Over the past year BCHI returned +40.30% vs +26.05% for VYM, so BCHI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BCHI annualized +36.11% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCHI or VYM?
BCHI has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BCHI -16.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BCHI and VYM?
BCHI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCHI and VYM?
BCHI and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 656 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCHI or VYM?
BCHI yields 3.45% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.