BCHI vs VOO
GMO Beyond China ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BCHI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCHI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.45% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +22.35% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.19% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GMO | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BCHI vs VOO Performance
GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) is a ETF from GMO and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCHI returned +39.19% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, BCHI is up 22.35% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCHI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for BCHI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCHI charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCHI currently yields 3.45% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BCHI and VOO share 0 holdings out of 603 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCHI or VOO?
BCHI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCHI or VOO?
Over the past year BCHI returned +39.19% vs +23.01% for VOO, so BCHI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BCHI annualized +35.46% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCHI or VOO?
BCHI has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BCHI -16.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BCHI and VOO?
BCHI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCHI and VOO?
BCHI and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 603 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCHI or VOO?
BCHI yields 3.45% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.