BFAP vs IVV
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFAP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 24.97% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -22.96% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -30.00% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BFAP vs IVV Performance
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BFAP returned -30.00% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, BFAP is down 22.96% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BFAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for BFAP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFAP charges 0.90% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFAP currently yields 24.97% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFAP or IVV?
BFAP has an expense ratio of 0.90% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BFAP or IVV?
Over the past year BFAP returned -30.00% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BFAP annualized -10.94% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BFAP or IVV?
BFAP has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BFAP -34.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BFAP and IVV?
BFAP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFAP or IVV?
BFAP yields 24.97% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BFAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.