BFAP vs VYM
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFAP | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 24.97% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -22.47% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -29.31% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BFAP vs VYM Performance
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BFAP returned -29.31% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, BFAP is down 22.47% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BFAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for BFAP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFAP charges 0.90% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $4 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFAP currently yields 24.97% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFAP or VYM?
BFAP has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BFAP or VYM?
Over the past year BFAP returned -29.31% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BFAP annualized -10.58% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BFAP or VYM?
BFAP has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BFAP -34.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BFAP and VYM?
BFAP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFAP or VYM?
BFAP yields 24.97% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BFAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.