BIS vs IVV

BIS vs IVV

Which is better, BIS or IVV?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.58, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBISIVV
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$876.4B
Dividend Yield6.96%1.06%
Holdings5508
YTD Return-36.84%+12.39%Best
1Y Return-54.44%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-32.82%+21.38%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-17.23%+13.51%Best
Volatility (annualized)39.6%14.5%Best
Max Drawdown--33.9%
$10,000 over 5 years$3,885$18,844Best
Fund FamilyProSharesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 6, 2010May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 8, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.4 years).

BIS vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.4 years both funds cover.

BIS vs IVV Performance

ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) is an ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BIS returned -54.44% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, BIS is down 36.84% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.

Over three years, BIS compounded at -32.82% per year against +21.38% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -17.23% and +13.51% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.51% annualized vs -33.09%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.6% compared with 14.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.58. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BIS charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIS currently yields 6.96% against 1.06% for IVV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BIS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BISIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BIS or IVV?

BIS has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BIS or IVV?

Over the past year BIS returned -54.44% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BIS annualized -33.09% vs +12.51% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BIS or IVV?

BIS has been the more volatile fund at 39.6% annualized versus 14.5% for IVV.

Should I hold both BIS and IVV?

BIS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.58, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BIS or IVV?

BIS yields 6.96% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BIS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BIS?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.58, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.