BIS vs VYM
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BIS | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.61% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -39.42% | +14.84% | |
| 1Y Return | -59.12% | +20.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -32.43% | +18.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -17.76% | +12.04% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BIS vs VYM Performance
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIS returned -59.12% while VYM returned +20.88%. Year to date, BIS is down 39.42% versus a gain of 14.84% for VYM.
Over three years, BIS compounded at -32.43% per year against +18.34% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -17.76% and +12.04% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs -33.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for BIS and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BIS charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIS currently yields 5.61% against 2.24% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BIS or VYM?
BIS has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BIS or VYM?
Over the past year BIS returned -59.12% vs +20.88% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BIS annualized -33.35% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BIS or VYM?
BIS has been the more volatile fund at 39.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BIS -99.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BIS and VYM?
BIS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BIS or VYM?
BIS yields 5.61% while VYM yields 2.24%, so BIS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.