BIS vs VOO

BIS vs VOO

Which is better, BIS or VOO?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.56, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBISVOO
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$997.4B
Dividend Yield6.96%1.04%
Holdings5509
YTD Return-36.84%+12.37%Best
1Y Return-54.44%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-32.82%+21.37%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-17.23%+13.49%Best
Volatility (annualized)39.2%14.1%Best
Max Drawdown--34.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$3,885$18,827Best
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 6, 2010Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16 years).

BIS vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.

BIS vs VOO Performance

ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIS returned -54.44% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, BIS is down 36.84% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Over three years, BIS compounded at -32.82% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -17.23% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.39% annualized vs -34.08%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.56. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BIS charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIS currently yields 6.96% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BIS and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BISVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BIS or VOO?

BIS has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BIS or VOO?

Over the past year BIS returned -54.44% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BIS annualized -34.08% vs +13.39% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BIS or VOO?

BIS has been the more volatile fund at 39.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO.

Should I hold both BIS and VOO?

BIS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.56, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BIS or VOO?

BIS yields 6.96% while VOO yields 1.04%, so BIS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than BIS?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.56, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.