BIS vs VTI
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BIS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.79% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -32.69% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -55.28% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -30.40% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -16.47% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
BIS vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BIS returned -55.28% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, BIS is down 32.69% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, BIS compounded at -30.40% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -16.47% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -32.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for BIS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BIS charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BIS currently yields 5.79% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BIS or VTI?
BIS has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BIS or VTI?
Over the past year BIS returned -55.28% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BIS annualized -32.99% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BIS or VTI?
BIS has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BIS -99.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BIS and VTI?
BIS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BIS or VTI?
BIS yields 5.79% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BIS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.