BITU vs IVV
ProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $353M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 106.13% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -59.46% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -79.66% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 90.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 2, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
BITU vs IVV Performance
ProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BITU returned -79.66% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, BITU is down 59.46% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BITU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 90.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.5% for BITU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITU charges 0.98% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITU currently yields 106.13% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BITU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITU or IVV?
BITU has an expense ratio of 0.98% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BITU or IVV?
Over the past year BITU returned -79.66% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BITU annualized -35.07% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BITU or IVV?
BITU has been the more volatile fund at 90.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BITU -83.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BITU and IVV?
BITU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BITU and IVV?
BITU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITU or IVV?
BITU yields 106.13% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BITU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.