BITU vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $353M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 106.13% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -60.11% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -79.99% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 90.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 2, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
BITU vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BITU returned -79.99% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, BITU is down 60.11% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BITU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 90.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.5% for BITU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITU charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITU currently yields 106.13% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BITU and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITU or VTI?
BITU has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BITU or VTI?
Over the past year BITU returned -79.99% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BITU annualized -35.49% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BITU or VTI?
BITU has been the more volatile fund at 90.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BITU -83.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BITU and VTI?
BITU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BITU and VTI?
BITU and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITU or VTI?
BITU yields 106.13% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BITU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.