BITY vs IVV
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITY | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 44.97% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -36.46% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -53.75% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 29, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BITY vs IVV Performance
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BITY returned -53.75% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, BITY is down 36.46% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BITY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.5% for BITY and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITY charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITY currently yields 44.97% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BITY and IVV share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITY or IVV?
BITY has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BITY or IVV?
Over the past year BITY returned -53.75% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BITY annualized -34.17% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BITY or IVV?
BITY has been the more volatile fund at 37.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BITY -57.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BITY and IVV?
BITY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BITY and IVV?
BITY and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITY or IVV?
BITY yields 44.97% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BITY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.