BITY vs QQQ
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $12M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 44.97% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -37.14% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | -54.57% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 29, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BITY vs QQQ Performance
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BITY returned -54.57% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, BITY is down 37.14% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BITY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.4% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.5% for BITY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITY charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITY currently yields 44.97% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BITY and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITY or QQQ?
BITY has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BITY or QQQ?
Over the past year BITY returned -54.57% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BITY annualized -34.61% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BITY or QQQ?
BITY has been the more volatile fund at 37.4% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BITY -57.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BITY and QQQ?
BITY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BITY and QQQ?
BITY and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITY or QQQ?
BITY yields 44.97% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BITY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.