BKEM vs IVV
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. BKEM offers more diversification with 1,795 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKEM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $91M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.85% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 1,795 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -59.73% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -54.32% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -14.96% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.75% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -71.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 22, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
BKEM vs IVV Performance
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BKEM returned -54.32% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, BKEM is down 59.73% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, BKEM compounded at -14.96% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -12.75% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.3% for BKEM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKEM charges 0.11% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKEM currently yields 3.85% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BKEM and IVV share 1 holdings out of 1791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKEM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG | 0.01% | 0.53% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKEM or IVV?
BKEM has an expense ratio of 0.11% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKEM or IVV?
Over the past year BKEM returned -54.32% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKEM annualized -5.36% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKEM or IVV?
BKEM has been the more volatile fund at 32.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BKEM -71.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BKEM and IVV?
BKEM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKEM and IVV?
BKEM and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKEM or IVV?
BKEM yields 3.85% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BKEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.