BKEM vs IVV

BKEM vs IVV

Which is better, BKEM or IVV?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BKEM led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBKEMIVV
Expense Ratio0.11%0.03%Best
AUM$93M$876.4B
Dividend Yield3.73%1.06%
Holdings1,795508
YTD Return+18.17%Best+11.51%
1Y Return+26.46%Best+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.11%Best+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.43%+12.66%Best
Volatility (annualized)16.8%15.4%Best
Max Drawdown-39.5%-24.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$14,310$18,149Best
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 22, 2020May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 24, 2020 to Sep 15, 2026 (6.4 years).

BKEM vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.

BKEM vs IVV Performance

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BKEM returned +26.46% while IVV returned +15.96%. Year to date, BKEM is up 18.17% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.

Over three years, BKEM compounded at +21.11% per year against +21.01% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.43% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +18.09% annualized vs +12.06%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BKEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.5% for BKEM and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BKEM charges 0.11% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKEM currently yields 3.73% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in BKEM0.1%

At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings BKEM also owns.

Stated as a floor: for BKEM, our book for it covers 92.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.

2 positions in common, counted across the 1,186 positions we hold weights for in BKEM and 490 in IVV, against full books of 1,795 and 508.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BKEMWeight in IVVDifference
HALHalliburton Co.0.07%0.05%0.02%
LHLabcorp Holdings Inc0.07%0.04%0.03%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BKEM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BKEMIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BKEM or IVV?

BKEM has an expense ratio of 0.11% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BKEM or IVV?

Over the past year BKEM returned +26.46% vs +15.96% for IVV, so BKEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKEM annualized +12.06% vs +18.09% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BKEM or IVV?

BKEM has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BKEM -39.5% vs IVV -24.5%.

Should I hold both BKEM and IVV?

BKEM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BKEM or IVV?

BKEM yields 3.73% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BKEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BKEM?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BKEM led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.