BKEM vs VTI
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKEM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $91M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.85% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,795 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -59.73% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -54.32% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -14.96% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.75% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -71.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 22, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
BKEM vs VTI Performance
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKEM returned -54.32% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, BKEM is down 59.73% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, BKEM compounded at -14.96% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -12.75% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.3% for BKEM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKEM charges 0.11% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKEM currently yields 3.85% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKEM or VTI?
BKEM has an expense ratio of 0.11% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKEM or VTI?
Over the past year BKEM returned -54.32% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKEM annualized -5.36% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKEM or VTI?
BKEM has been the more volatile fund at 32.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BKEM -71.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BKEM and VTI?
BKEM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKEM and VTI?
BKEM and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4072 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKEM or VTI?
BKEM yields 3.85% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BKEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.