BKMC vs QQQ
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BKMC or QQQ?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
BKMC has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKMC is less concentrated, with 5.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKMC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $648M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.03% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 405 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +8.50% | +17.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.95% | +22.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.65% | +25.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.13% | +14.60%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.0%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,111 | $19,766Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 5.2%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (6.4 years).
BKMC vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
BKMC vs QQQ Performance
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BKMC returned +10.95% while QQQ returned +22.10%. Year to date, BKMC is up 8.50% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Over three years, BKMC compounded at +14.65% per year against +25.27% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.13% and +14.60% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +22.46% annualized vs +14.57%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 17.1% for BKMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.0% for BKMC and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKMC charges 0.04% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $18 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKMC currently yields 2.03% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 402 holdings in BKMC and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 402 positions we hold weights for in BKMC and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 405 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BKMC (97.5% of the fund), and 385 for BKMC that do not appear in QQQ (96.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKMC and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKMC or QQQ?
BKMC has an expense ratio of 0.04% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BKMC is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKMC or QQQ?
Over the past year BKMC returned +10.95% vs +22.10% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKMC annualized +14.57% vs +22.46% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKMC or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 17.1% for BKMC. Worst drawdown: BKMC -25.0% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both BKMC and QQQ?
BKMC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKMC or QQQ?
BKMC yields 2.03% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BKMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BKMC?
BKMC has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKMC is less concentrated, with 5.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.