BKMC vs VXUS
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, BKMC or VXUS?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
BKMC has a lower expense ratio. BKMC led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKMC | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.05% |
| AUM | $648M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.03% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 405 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +7.70% | +12.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.06% | +19.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.38% | +19.10%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.81% | +8.63%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.0%Best | -29.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,901 | $15,127Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2020 to Sep 16, 2026 (6.4 years).
BKMC vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
BKMC vs VXUS Performance
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKMC returned +10.06% while VXUS returned +19.22%. Year to date, BKMC is up 7.70% versus a gain of 12.21% for VXUS.
Over three years, BKMC compounded at +14.38% per year against +19.10% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.81% and +8.63% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BKMC has the edge at +14.45% annualized vs +13.81%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.8% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.0% for BKMC and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKMC charges 0.04% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $5 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKMC currently yields 2.03% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.8% of BKMC's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
BKMC and VXUS share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 402 positions we hold weights for in BKMC and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 405 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKMC | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JHX:AUJames Hardie Industries PLC | 0.43% | 0.03% | 0.40% |
| APA:AUSan Mateo Un High Sch Dist 02b | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.36% |
| 9987:CNYum China Holdings Inc | 0.37% | 0.03% | 0.34% |
| EGPEastgroup Properties Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.27% |
| AMAntero Midstream Corporationam | 0.19% | 0.01% | 0.18% |
| BEPC:CABrookfield Renewable Corporation Class A Subordinate Voting Shares | 0.12% | 0.01% | 0.11% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKMC and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKMC or VXUS?
BKMC has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VXUS charges 0.05%. BKMC is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKMC or VXUS?
Over the past year BKMC returned +10.06% vs +19.22% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKMC annualized +14.45% vs +13.81% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKMC or VXUS?
BKMC has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.8% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BKMC -25.0% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both BKMC and VXUS?
BKMC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKMC and VXUS?
At least 1.8% of BKMC's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 402 positions we hold weights for in BKMC and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKMC or VXUS?
BKMC yields 2.03% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than BKMC?
BKMC has a lower expense ratio. BKMC led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.