BKMC vs VXUS

Quick Verdict

BKMC has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.

Lower Fees: BKMCHigher Returns: VXUSMore Diversified: VXUS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBKMCVXUSWinner
Expense Ratio0.04%0.05%
AUM$655M$156.5B
Dividend Yield0.45%2.60%
Holdings4038,747
YTD Return-61.99%+14.57%
1Y Return-59.17%+27.82%
3Y Return (annualized)-20.09%+19.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-13.13%+9.28%
Volatility (annualized)32.3%15.1%
Max Drawdown-67.7%-39.9%
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 7, 2020Jan 26, 2011

BKMC vs VXUS Performance

BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKMC returned -59.17% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BKMC is down 61.99% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.

Over three years, BKMC compounded at -20.09% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -13.13% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BKMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.7% for BKMC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BKMC charges 0.04% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $5 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKMC currently yields 0.45% against 2.60% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

0.1%overlap

BKMC and VXUS share 7 holdings out of 8255 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BKMCWeight in VXUSDifference
YUMC0.43%0.03%0.40%
JHX:AU0.31%0.03%0.28%
EGP0.29%0.00%0.29%
ESEProProPro
AMProProPro
GLXYProProPro
CANProProPro
See all 7 holdings BKMC shares with VXUS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BKMC or VXUS?

BKMC has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VXUS charges 0.05%. BKMC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BKMC or VXUS?

Over the past year BKMC returned -59.17% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKMC annualized -2.70% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BKMC or VXUS?

BKMC has been the more volatile fund at 32.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BKMC -67.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both BKMC and VXUS?

BKMC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BKMC and VXUS?

BKMC and VXUS share 7 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8255 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BKMC or VXUS?

BKMC yields 0.45% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →