BLDG vs QQQ
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLDG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $55M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.17% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +10.51% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.19% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.43% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.16% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BLDG vs QQQ Performance
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BLDG returned +10.19% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, BLDG is up 10.51% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, BLDG compounded at +10.43% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.16% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.8% for BLDG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.3% for BLDG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLDG charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLDG currently yields 5.17% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BLDG and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 180 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLDG or QQQ?
BLDG has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLDG or QQQ?
Over the past year BLDG returned +10.19% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BLDG annualized +7.47% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLDG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.8% for BLDG. Worst drawdown: BLDG -27.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BLDG and QQQ?
BLDG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BLDG and QQQ?
BLDG and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 180 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLDG or QQQ?
BLDG yields 5.17% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BLDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.