BLDG vs VOO
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLDG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $55M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.17% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.96% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.28% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.25% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.18% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BLDG vs VOO Performance
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BLDG returned +10.28% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, BLDG is up 9.96% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, BLDG compounded at +10.25% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.18% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLDG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.3% for BLDG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLDG charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLDG currently yields 5.17% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BLDG and VOO share 5 holdings out of 578 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLDG or VOO?
BLDG has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLDG or VOO?
Over the past year BLDG returned +10.28% vs +21.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BLDG annualized +7.38% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLDG or VOO?
BLDG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BLDG -27.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BLDG and VOO?
BLDG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BLDG and VOO?
BLDG and VOO share 5 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 578 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLDG or VOO?
BLDG yields 5.17% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BLDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.