BLDG vs IVV
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BLDG or IVV?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BLDG is less concentrated, with 19.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLDG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.17% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 84 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.61% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.89% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.54% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.39% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.3% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,254 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.1%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2020 to Sep 4, 2026 (5.9 years).
BLDG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
BLDG vs IVV Performance
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BLDG returned +7.89% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, BLDG is up 9.61% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, BLDG compounded at +9.54% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +2.39% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +17.24% annualized vs +7.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLDG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.3% for BLDG and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLDG charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLDG currently yields 5.17% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
6.5% of BLDG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings BLDG also owns.
BLDG and IVV share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in BLDG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 84 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BLDG (99.0% of the fund), and 41 for BLDG that do not appear in IVV (56.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BLDG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLDG or IVV?
BLDG has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BLDG or IVV?
Over the past year BLDG returned +7.89% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BLDG annualized +7.27% vs +17.24% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BLDG or IVV?
BLDG has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BLDG -27.3% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both BLDG and IVV?
BLDG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BLDG and IVV?
6.5% of BLDG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.3% of IVV's is in holdings BLDG also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in BLDG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLDG or IVV?
BLDG yields 5.17% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BLDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BLDG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BLDG is less concentrated, with 19.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.