BMDL vs QQQ
VictoryShares WestEnd Economic Cycle Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BMDL offers more diversification with 420 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMDL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $113M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.96% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 420 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.16% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.80% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BMDL vs QQQ Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Economic Cycle Bond ETF (BMDL) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BMDL returned +5.80% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, BMDL is up 0.16% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 4.6% for BMDL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.3% for BMDL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMDL charges 0.40% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $18 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMDL currently yields 3.96% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BMDL and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BMDL | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMDL or QQQ?
BMDL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BMDL or QQQ?
Over the past year BMDL returned +5.80% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BMDL annualized +4.37% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BMDL or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 4.6% for BMDL. Worst drawdown: BMDL -6.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BMDL and QQQ?
BMDL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BMDL and QQQ?
BMDL and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMDL or QQQ?
BMDL yields 3.96% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BMDL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.