BMDL vs VTI
VictoryShares WestEnd Economic Cycle Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BMDL or VTI?
Long Term High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMDL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $113M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.96% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 420 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6%Best | 10.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.3%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $10,708 | $12,840Best |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 212 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BMDL has data through Feb 4, 2026 and VTI through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 21, 2024 to Feb 4, 2026 (1.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.5% compared with 4.6% for BMDL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.3% for BMDL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMDL charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMDL currently yields 3.96% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of BMDL's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 273 days apart, BMDL as of Sep 30, 2025 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 412 positions we hold weights for in BMDL and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 420 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BMDL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMDL or VTI?
BMDL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BMDL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 10.5% annualized versus 4.6% for BMDL. Worst drawdown: BMDL -6.3% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BMDL and VTI?
BMDL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMDL or VTI?
BMDL yields 3.96% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BMDL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BMDL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.