BMDL vs VTI
VictoryShares WestEnd Economic Cycle Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMDL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $113M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.96% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 420 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.16% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.80% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
BMDL vs VTI Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Economic Cycle Bond ETF (BMDL) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BMDL returned +5.80% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, BMDL is up 0.16% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 4.6% for BMDL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.3% for BMDL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMDL charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMDL currently yields 3.96% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMDL or VTI?
BMDL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BMDL or VTI?
Over the past year BMDL returned +5.80% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BMDL annualized +4.37% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BMDL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 4.6% for BMDL. Worst drawdown: BMDL -6.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BMDL and VTI?
BMDL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BMDL and VTI?
BMDL and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3197 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMDL or VTI?
BMDL yields 3.96% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BMDL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.