BMNU vs VOO
T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BMNU or VOO?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMNU | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $327M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +293.78%Best | +14.14% |
| 1Y Return | -7.25% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1449.1% | 13.1%Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BMNU vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BMNU vs VOO Performance
T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BMNU returned -7.25% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, BMNU is up 293.78% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BMNU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1449.1% compared with 13.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.09. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMNU charges 1.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMNU currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in BMNU and 494 in VOO, totalling 4.6% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in BMNU and 494 in VOO, against full books of 7 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BMNU and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMNU or VOO?
BMNU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BMNU or VOO?
Over the past year BMNU returned -7.25% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BMNU or VOO?
BMNU has been the more volatile fund at 1449.1% annualized versus 13.1% for VOO.
Should I hold both BMNU and VOO?
BMNU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.09, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMNU or VOO?
BMNU yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BMNU?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.