BRKD vs NVDS
Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X ETF vs Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
Which is better, BRKD or NVDS?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
BRKD has a lower expense ratio. BRKD led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.62, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRKD | NVDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00%Best | 1.15% |
| AUM | $1M | $11M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.82% | 21.23% |
| Holdings | 7 | 6 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8%Best | 47.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9%Best | -73.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,083Best | $4,204 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Tradr ETFs |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | Jul 13, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 182 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BRKD has data through Apr 10, 2026 and NVDS through Oct 9, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2024 to Apr 10, 2026 (1.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.3% compared with 16.8% for BRKD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for BRKD and -73.8% for NVDS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.62. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRKD charges 1.00% per year while NVDS charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $115 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRKD currently yields 2.82% against 21.23% for NVDS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BRKD and NVDS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRKD or NVDS?
BRKD has an expense ratio of 1.00% while NVDS charges 1.15%. BRKD is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BRKD or NVDS?
NVDS has been the more volatile fund at 47.3% annualized versus 16.8% for BRKD. Worst drawdown: BRKD -17.9% vs NVDS -73.8%.
Should I hold both BRKD and NVDS?
BRKD and NVDS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.62, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRKD or NVDS?
BRKD yields 2.82% while NVDS yields 21.23%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NVDS better than BRKD?
BRKD has a lower expense ratio. BRKD led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.62, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.