BSJP vs VOO

BSJP vs VOO

Which is better, BSJP or VOO?

High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSJPVOO
Expense Ratio0.43%0.03%Best
AUM$538M$997.4B
Dividend Yield4.53%1.08%
Holdings9509
Volatility (annualized)6.8%Best16.4%
Max Drawdown-25.4%Best-34.3%
Top 10 Weight-36.4%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleHigh Yield BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 26, 2017Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: YTD Price Return, 1Y Price Return, 3Y Price Return (annualized), 5Y Price Return (annualized), $10,000 over 8.2 years.

The two price series end 261 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BSJP has data through Dec 17, 2025 and VOO through Sep 4, 2026.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 8.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2017 to Dec 17, 2025 (8.2 years).

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 6.8% for BSJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for BSJP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSJP charges 0.43% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJP currently yields 4.53% against 1.08% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 8 holdings in BSJP and 505 in VOO, totalling 100.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 305 days apart, BSJP as of Aug 29, 2025 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in BSJP and 505 in VOO, against full books of 9 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 497 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BSJP (99.5% of the fund), and 8 for BSJP that do not appear in VOO (100.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BSJP and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BSJPVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSJP or VOO?

BSJP has an expense ratio of 0.43% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, BSJP or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 6.8% for BSJP. Worst drawdown: BSJP -25.4% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both BSJP and VOO?

BSJP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSJP or VOO?

BSJP yields 4.53% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BSJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than BSJP?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.