BSJS vs IVV
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $726M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.22% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 198 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +2.53% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.92% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.29% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.32% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
BSJS vs IVV Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSJS returned +4.92% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, BSJS is up 2.53% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, BSJS compounded at +8.29% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.32% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.3% for BSJS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for BSJS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJS charges 0.42% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJS currently yields 6.22% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BSJS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 690 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJS or IVV?
BSJS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSJS or IVV?
Over the past year BSJS returned +4.92% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BSJS annualized +3.56% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSJS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.3% for BSJS. Worst drawdown: BSJS -17.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BSJS and IVV?
BSJS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJS and IVV?
BSJS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 690 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJS or IVV?
BSJS yields 6.22% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BSJS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.