BSJS vs QQQ
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSJS offers more diversification with 185 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $726M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.22% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 198 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.60% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.99% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.33% | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.33% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BSJS vs QQQ Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSJS returned +4.99% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, BSJS is up 2.60% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Over three years, BSJS compounded at +8.33% per year against +25.51% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.33% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.3% for BSJS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for BSJS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJS charges 0.42% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $18 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJS currently yields 6.22% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BSJS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 288 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJS or QQQ?
BSJS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSJS or QQQ?
Over the past year BSJS returned +4.99% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BSJS annualized +3.57% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSJS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.3% for BSJS. Worst drawdown: BSJS -17.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BSJS and QQQ?
BSJS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJS and QQQ?
BSJS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 288 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJS or QQQ?
BSJS yields 6.22% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BSJS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.