BSMC vs VTI
Brandes US Small-Mid Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BSMC or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BSMC is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSMC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $181M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 73 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +9.92% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.04% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.28% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,320 | $18,595Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Brandes Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 6, 2023 to Sep 25, 2026 (3 years).
BSMC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BSMC vs VTI Performance
Brandes US Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) is an ETF from Brandes Investment Partners and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSMC returned +17.04% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, BSMC is up 9.92% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, BSMC compounded at +15.28% per year against +23.04% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for BSMC and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSMC charges 0.71% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $3 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSMC currently yields 0.90% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
81.6% of BSMC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's money is in holdings BSMC also owns.
Most of BSMC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
60 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in BSMC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 73 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,108 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BSMC (96.7% of the fund), and 5 for BSMC that do not appear in VTI (12.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSMC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| INVXInnovex Internat | 3.13% | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| IFFInternational Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | 2.84% | 0.03% | 2.81% |
| EPCEdgewell Personal Care Co | 2.59% | 0.00% | 2.59% |
| ELANElanco Animal Health, Inc Cvr | 2.54% | 0.02% | 2.52% |
| IMKTAIngles Markets Incorporated Class A | 2.48% | 0.00% | 2.48% |
| ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings | 2.41% | 0.03% | 2.38% |
| XRAYDentsply Sirona Inc. | 2.42% | 0.00% | 2.42% |
| UNFUnifirst Corp/ma | 2.37% | 0.01% | 2.36% |
| EPAMEpam Systems, Inc. | 2.24% | 0.01% | 2.23% |
| CPBCampbell Soup Co. | 2.16% | 0.01% | 2.15% |
81.6% of BSMC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSMC or VTI?
BSMC has an expense ratio of 0.71% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSMC or VTI?
Over the past year BSMC returned +17.04% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSMC or VTI?
BSMC has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BSMC -19.1% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BSMC and VTI?
BSMC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BSMC and VTI?
81.6% of BSMC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's is in holdings BSMC also owns. They hold 60 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in BSMC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSMC or VTI?
BSMC yields 0.90% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BSMC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BSMC is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.