BSMC vs VTI
Brandes US Small-Mid Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BSMC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSMC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $172M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.29% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.89% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Brandes Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
BSMC vs VTI Performance
Brandes US Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) is a ETF from Brandes Investment Partners and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSMC returned +24.89% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, BSMC is up 17.29% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.3% for BSMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for BSMC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSMC charges 0.71% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $3 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSMC currently yields 0.93% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BSMC and VTI share 49 holdings out of 2804 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSMC or VTI?
BSMC has an expense ratio of 0.71% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $68 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSMC or VTI?
Over the past year BSMC returned +24.89% vs +22.39% for VTI, so BSMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSMC annualized +18.63% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSMC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.3% for BSMC. Worst drawdown: BSMC -19.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BSMC and VTI?
BSMC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSMC and VTI?
BSMC and VTI share 49 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2804 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSMC or VTI?
BSMC yields 0.93% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.