BSMC vs IVV
Brandes US Small-Mid Cap Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BSMC or IVV?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BSMC is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSMC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $181M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 73 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.90% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.49% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.73% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,500 | $18,618Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Brandes Investment Partners | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 6, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).
BSMC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BSMC vs IVV Performance
Brandes US Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) is an ETF from Brandes Investment Partners and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSMC returned +15.49% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, BSMC is up 10.90% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, BSMC compounded at +15.73% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for BSMC and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSMC charges 0.71% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $3 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSMC currently yields 0.90% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
22.7% of BSMC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.5% of IVV's money is in holdings BSMC also owns.
BSMC and IVV share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in BSMC and 490 in IVV, against full books of 73 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 467 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BSMC (98.2% of the fund), and 45 for BSMC that do not appear in IVV (70.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSMC | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFFInternational Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | 2.84% | 0.03% | 2.81% |
| ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings | 2.41% | 0.03% | 2.38% |
| CFGCitizens Financial Group Inc. | 2.06% | 0.04% | 2.02% |
| OMCOmnicom Group Inc. | 1.92% | 0.04% | 1.88% |
| TXTTextron Inc. | 1.92% | 0.02% | 1.90% |
| HALHalliburton Co. | 1.46% | 0.05% | 1.41% |
| BROBrown & Brown Inc | 1.47% | 0.03% | 1.44% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 1.26% | 0.02% | 1.24% |
| STZConstellation Brands Inc Common Stock Usd 0.01 | 1.20% | 0.03% | 1.17% |
| ZBRAZebra Technologies Corp | 1.16% | 0.03% | 1.13% |
22.7% of BSMC is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSMC or IVV?
BSMC has an expense ratio of 0.71% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSMC or IVV?
Over the past year BSMC returned +15.49% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSMC or IVV?
BSMC has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BSMC -19.1% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BSMC and IVV?
BSMC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BSMC and IVV?
22.7% of BSMC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.5% of IVV's is in holdings BSMC also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in BSMC and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSMC or IVV?
BSMC yields 0.90% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BSMC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BSMC is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.