BSR vs VTI
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BSR or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.76% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +4.67% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.38% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.26% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $12,922 | $19,363Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 72.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Beacon Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 18, 2023 to Oct 2, 2026 (3.5 years).
BSR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
BSR vs VTI Performance
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF (BSR) is an ETF from Beacon Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSR returned +6.38% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, BSR is up 4.67% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, BSR compounded at +9.26% per year against +23.41% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +20.78% annualized vs +7.60%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 9.4% for BSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for BSR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSR charges 1.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $3 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSR currently yields 2.76% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in BSR and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BSR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 60 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BSR (97.5% of the fund), and 29 for BSR that do not appear in VTI (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSR or VTI?
BSR has an expense ratio of 1.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $106 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSR or VTI?
Over the past year BSR returned +6.38% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BSR annualized +7.60% vs +20.78% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 9.4% for BSR. Worst drawdown: BSR -15.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BSR and VTI?
BSR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSR or VTI?
BSR yields 2.76% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BSR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.