BSR vs VTI
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $35M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.83% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.18% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.20% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.02% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Beacon Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
BSR vs VTI Performance
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF (BSR) is a ETF from Beacon Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSR returned +8.20% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, BSR is up 4.18% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, BSR compounded at +8.02% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.6% for BSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for BSR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSR charges 1.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $3 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSR currently yields 2.83% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BSR and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2814 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSR or VTI?
BSR has an expense ratio of 1.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $106 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSR or VTI?
Over the past year BSR returned +8.20% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSR annualized +7.73% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.6% for BSR. Worst drawdown: BSR -15.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BSR and VTI?
BSR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSR and VTI?
BSR and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2814 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSR or VTI?
BSR yields 2.83% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.